Rappler’s Vindication: Overcoming Eight Years of Harassment

Introduction

In a monumental victory for press freedom, the Philippine Court of Appeals has overturned the shutdown order against Rappler, a news site co-founded by Nobel laureate Maria Ressa. This ruling marks a significant milestone in the ongoing legal battle that has plagued Rappler for the past eight years.

Background and Legal Challenges

During the tenure of former President Rodrigo Duterte, Rappler and its fearless founder, Maria Ressa, faced relentless attacks from the government. In 2018, the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revoked Rappler’s operating license, citing violations of foreign equity restrictions on domestic media. The SEC’s decision was upheld in 2022, days before Duterte left office.

Court’s Decision

Reversing the SEC’s ruling, the Court of Appeals ruled that the agency had “acted with grave abuse of discretion” in revoking Rappler’s certificate of incorporation. The court found the SEC’s accusations of foreign ownership to be unsubstantiated.

Rappler’s Response

Rappler hailed the decision as a “vindication” and a testament to the resilience of journalism. The news site celebrated its victories in a series of court cases and reaffirmed its commitment to speaking truth to power.

Foreign Investment Restrictions

Philippine law reserves media investment for Filipinos or Filipino-controlled entities. The case against Rappler stemmed from a 2015 investment by the United States-based Omidyar Network. Rappler argued that Omidyar was a silent investor, but the government maintained that the investment breached the ownership restrictions.

Human Rights Concerns

Carlos Conde, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, welcomed the court’s decision, calling it a victory for justice and good sense. He highlighted the alarming pattern of harassment and intimidation against journalists and independent media in the Philippines.

Maria Ressa’s Ongoing Legal Battles

Despite the victory against the shutdown order, Maria Ressa continues to face other legal challenges. She is currently on bail after being convicted in 2020 in a cyber-libel case. She has appealed the decision to the country’s top court. She also faces a potential 15-year jail sentence if convicted in a separate case related to the Omidyar investment.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeals’ decision to overturn Rappler’s shutdown order is a resounding victory for press freedom and a recognition of the vital role that independent media plays in a democratic society. It serves as a reminder that even in the face of adversity and harassment, journalism can and must prevail in its mission to inform, hold power accountable, and shape a more equitable world.